Bay City, Michigan 48706
Front Page 03/28/2024 14:11 About us
www.mybaycity.com August 5, 2009
(Prior Story)   Columns ArTicle 4112   (Next Story)

Town Hall "Protesters" Not Conservatives But Reactionary Political Hacks

Don't Let Inflammatory Rhetoric, Meeting Disruptions Escalate to Violence

August 5, 2009       4 Comments
By: Dave Rogers

Printer Friendly Story View

No doubt Bill Buckley is rolling over in his grave at the antics of today's maniacs working under the banner of "conservatism."
 

A true political conservative would never be caught dead causing a ruckus at a public meeting.

No doubt Bill Buckley is rolling over in his grave at the antics of today's maniacs working under the banner of "conservatism."

A true conservative is a thoughtful portrayer of less government and restrained spending, a fiscal moderate while showing concern for the less fortunate through philanthropy and support of social justice.

The fruitcakes now making fools of themselves opposing health care by what amounts to violence all over the country have no trace of thoughtfulness and reason. No recollection that while the U.S. Constitution guarantees free speech it gives no right to restrict others from the same. They want to win political points with a smash-mouth approach -- disrupt and defeat.

The health care needs of the American people are the last consideration of these ideological bullies; beating President Obama, marching him to his "Waterloo," are their aims. Reverse the results of the last election, trash the country, all be danged as long as we prevail -- that's their game.

And a nasty one it is. If the response by reasonable folks is confrontation, guess what? We have anarchy! The only recourse will be police power. Otherwise, our American experiment fails of unlimited free speech and rule of the minority takes over.

We certainly would not allow the same tactics to be perpetrated by left wing operatives, would we?

Here's what President Obama himself says: "Passing comprehensive health insurance reform will not be easy. Every President since Harry Truman has talked about it, and the most powerful and experienced lobbyists in Washington stand in the way.

"But every day we don't act, Americans watch their premiums rise three times faster than wages, small businesses and families are pushed towards bankruptcy, and 14,000 people lose their coverage entirely. The cost of inaction is simply too much for the people of this nation to bear.

"So yes, fixing this crisis will not be easy. Our opponents will attack us every day for daring to try. It will require time, and hard work, and there will be days when we don't know if we have anything more to give. But there comes a moment when we all have to choose between doing what's easy, and doing what's right."

A friend from Colorado writes that I am advocating "censorship" by urging reasonable people to turn off twisted talk show hosts. No, not really, I am continuing to be concerned about the takeover of America's airwaves by ideological fanatics funded by billionaires who spew what amounts to anti-American propaganda. In fact, that is what has happened since the Fairness Doctrine was repealed in 1989.

What to do? We refer them all to FactCheck.org, to Snopes.com, or other websites that research the truth. But why is this all necessary, why should these folks become incensed because our system allows the total corruption of the media, especially the public airwaves?

It is not censorship, in my opinion, to offer an alternative to information served up with acerbic, politically-motivated intent by paid propagandists for right wing manipulators.

The danger is that this one-sided dialogue inflames good-hearted but intellectually unsophisticated folks like my friend from Colorado, a woman from Gladwin we know, a pal from Tennessee, a relative from Pittsburgh who sends vicious negative erroneous e-mails continually, and on and on.

The concept behind the Fairness Doctrine is that there is only so much bandwidth and the public should be served by not allowing monopolization. We can see now the good sense behind that idea, I believe.

The free speech disrupters are whipped into a frenzy by maniacal radio and television "talk show" hosts. The so-called talk shows are nothing but blatant propaganda rallies for the lunatic fringe, right wing reactionaries marching in the footsteps of jackbooted thugs of the 1930s in several countries.

Make no mistake, Nazi Germany and Mussolini's Italy were not the only place the right wing ruled by violence; Henry Ford and his "police" at the Battle of the Overpass in Dearborn and, earlier, Andrew Carnegie with machine guns on rail flatcars in Pennsylvania mowed down the Molly Maguires. The Black Legion in Detroit made death the penalty for failing to be "one of the boys."

And the left wing was no less guilty of such violent tactics in America. Farmers in the Midwest turned to rioting and set up blockades to keep milk from being delivered to cities. Asserting they were re-enacting the Boston Tea Party (sound familiar?) they dumped milk on the highway.

Of course, all this had a predictable consequence: right wing reaction and violence. In San Francisco, Minneapolis and Flint, opponents of union organizing claimed to be protecting America from Communists.

Mick Hume, writing in the website "Spiked" says: "One thing that clearly distinguishes this financial disruption from earlier capitalist crises is the complete absence of any political alternatives. Unlike in the 1930s or 1970s, there is no Soviet Union or parties of Western state socialism to offer even the illusion of an alternative to capitalism. Society is widely described as facing a crisis, a crossroads, yet there is no serious debate about which road to take into a different future. The Conservative opposition in the UK has managed the considerable achievement of looking even more paralyzed than the government. Meanwhile, we are warned by the authorities that this is 'no time' for idle talk, as if we were facing a foreign invasion. But if now is not the time to raise questions about the direction of our society, when is?"

So what is free speech under the U.S. Constitution? Does it protect the right of self-interested financial giants to foist their views on everyone else by dominating the radio airwaves nearly around the clock? Does it include the right of fringe political groups to disrupt the free flow of ideas in public meetings by what amounts to violence?

Do we want to go down the road laid out by Karl Rove, Dick Armey and their cronies? Do we really want to tolerate violence, the disruption of the free flow of ideas by paid political operatives? Do we really want to allow the American system to be corrupted by fascist tactics?

I don't think so!

What do you think? ###

Printer Friendly Story View
Prior Article

February 10, 2020
by: Rachel Reh
Family Winter Fun Fest is BACC Hot Spot for 2/10/2020
Next Article

February 2, 2020
by: Kathy Rupert-Mathews
MOVIE REVIEW: "Just Mercy" ... You Will Shed Tears, or at Least You Should

"The BUZZ" - Read Feedback From Readers!

brandonbaycity Says:       On August 12, 2009 at 07:17 PM
Dave,

Not all of the people attending the townhalls are calling themselves, 'conservatives'. I should attack you on that but, its really not a bargain for me to do such. However, when you listen to the Questions at the townhalls regarding the Health Care and you draw an opinion that the people are being disruptive, yet you have failed to report the truth and merely snagged up a few lines from the 'State Run Media' and you go with it, why not? Olberman is a nice Guy, Ann Coulter and Huckabee are nice people, and then there is the Sunday Highlights and edited interviews. The news you see on TV, and the news you hear on the radio is paid for by you, many others, and I (advertiser dollars comes from consumer spenders), and regulated by the FCC, and most if not all of it has been censored in some way or another (one more freedom taken away) to control what you see and hear. Since, that is how I see that you have gathered the information for this article and left out the facts of the events that took place during this Congressional Summer Recess in August, and you blatantly badgered the Conservatives, and started the name calling its 'typical' for a statist. I will be a humble servant among all the readers of this article and present to you and all readers the FACTS about health care in this 'melting-pot' of a country.

As the members of Congress head home for the August recess, they should take a close look at some poll numbers before they attempt to pass any new legislation.

The most important fundamental is that 68% of American voters have health insurance coverage they rate good or excellent. Most of these voters approach the health-care debate fearing that they have more to lose than to gain.

While the president says his plan will reduce costs, 53% believe it will have the opposite effect.

There?s also the reality that 74% of voters rate the quality of care they now receive as good or excellent. And 52% fear that if Congress passes health-care reform, it will lead to a decline in quality of that care, and only 13% believe care would improve.

Also, 51% fear the federal government more than private insurance companies when it comes to health care decisions. Just 19% of Americans now rate the overall system as poor while 48% say it?s good or excellent. (Ed.?hardly a mandate for change!)

Source: Aug. 7 and 10, 2009 by Scott Rasmussen, founder and president of Rasmussen Reports (a national, non-partisan polling organization).

All polling data can be found at RasmussenReports.com.

One particular thing comes to mind when reading the article, and that is the whole left-right paradigm. Left attacking the right, right attacking the left, and somehow in the middle of it all arises communism, fascism. There is a left in this country, and it is totalitarianism. The whole paradigm of left and right is misinterpreted, and I see it as a pyramid scheme, one gets to say what ever it wants, yet when the other says what it wants, it is portrayed as some right wing blander or a "angry mob". When I heard all of that stuff about 'Angry Mob', I totally lost all respect for the DNC, blaming people for standing up for their rights and calling them names. Its one thing to make a statement about the people being blatant in their opposition to STATE-RUN Health Care, then to go run an ad that calls names, its very disturbing and I miss the point of it. The same goes for the GOP and their run around ads regarding the flagrant behavior of congressional members. WAKE UP. If there is any fight in this battle against tyranny of the majority, it should be for reasons of LESS GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN YOUR PERSONAL LIFE, LESS GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN YOUR BUSINESS. The battle however sad as it is, its for free speech first and the right to petition the government of their grievances, maybe if the reactions to tyranny is looked at another way, then maybe the others will get a second shake.

The efforts to get Congress, and Executive Branch, to read the facts in the fall of '08, during the banker bailouts (TARP). They did not listen to the people, and then the auto companies getting a bailout. The bailouts benefit the banks not the people. Once again, congress is not listening to the people about health care reform. Dave, IF YOU REMEMBER, there was a local health care option on the ballot in Bay County. The people VOTED 'NO', so what does our U.S. Representative do? Gets reelected and goes to Washington D.C., proceeds to go over the head of the people back home, and votes in favor of a National Healh Care plan. Can you blame the frustration of some people? Before I forget, let me remind you, if the first amendment doesn't work, the second amendment will.

Signed

Brandon.

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." John F. Kennedy, In a speech at the White House, 1962

**comment archived for re-submitting**
erik.johnson Says:       On August 21, 2009 at 09:52 AM
I disagree. You couldn't be more wrong on the protesters. What would a Bucklian-conservative (yes I made that word up) do when they were: 1)ignored when telling their reps to vote against TARP, 2) to vote against Stimulus, 3)vote against Cap & Trade, 4)Vote against HR 3200? All of which put us further in debt for no positive reason other than giving more power to Washington in a non-constitutional way. A Bucklian-conservative would likely have realized at some point that the Right vs. Left argument is a canard that Washington wants us to argue over while both sides push or "nudge" us closer to Brandon's totalitarian state. So the polite recourse would be to show up at a townhall meeting ou get on a townhall teleconference (the weasle's way out Mr. Kildee) in unprecedented numbers.

Sure there are kooks from all sides showing up, as demonstrated by the SEIU assaulting one of the protestors, but they are "useful idiots" for their causes. The reality is that for every kook, I've seen many more questions go unanswered by our non-representing representatives. Indeed, it points out the weakness of today's journalists who don't seem to know how to ask questions. When the politician gives an answer that is unacceptable, they hear from the townsfolks.

The reality here is that the President and Congress live in a bubble and this is the first time they are walking outside of the bubble in decades. The funny thing is that they seem most surprised/shocked at the fact that we have actually read the bills they are trying to pass. This obviously hasn't concerned them in the past. They should be very affraid. By that I mean for their job security. They are spending us into oblivion and have demonstrated no coherent thought as to why. As the curtain has been pulled back these last few weeks/months, we see frightend rats on both sides scrambling to protect what they can and try to remain re-electable.

I've thrown a few responses up here because I'm not sure what exactly your asking for a response to in your letter. The last thing I'll throw out and address is your last set of questions. You seem to think that Rove, Armey, et al are unique. I would see that and raise you a pair of Emanuel brothers, an Axlerod (big pharma tool), a slew of "Czars" and Acorn & SEIU as the muscle. As far as fascism goes, you can make the argument as Jonah Goldberg does that Italy and Germany learned from the best and that was us via the early 20th Century progressives in the US.

Erik
kim8349 Says:       On August 21, 2009 at 11:58 AM
Mr. Rogers, the only "intellectually unsophisticated folks" in this debate are the ones who believe everything the President tells them about his and the Democrats' plan for health care reform. Even the President doesn't know what is in this plan or how it will work.

I don't know a single person who thinks that no reform is needed. What the majority of protestors abhor is the fact that the government is rushing to a solution which will cost billions, destroy jobs, take away choices, and limit the freedoms of Americans all without addressing any of the real issues which make health care and health insurance more expensive. The government can play a part in fixing the problems with health insurance, but dismantling a system in favor of the plan outlined in HB 3200 is not going to work. Anyone who actually reads the bill and gives it any thought can tell you that it is the first step to a single-payer, govt controlled system. I don't want that and I will exercise my right to free speech to oppose it.

And just in case you were wondering, I am not a Republican, or a lobbyist, and nobody is paying me to share my thoughts or spread any message. I am highly educated wit a master's degree and then some. And furthermore, I know a lot of people just like me who think for themselves and come to the same conclusions I do. Your theory that opponents of the Obama health reform plan are somehow paid by lobbyists is complete fiction - or "propaganda" if you will- created by the most corrupt administration in the history of the United States.

And cleary you don't understand the how radio works. People listen to radio they like and can identify with. Advertisers pay because they want to be heard by the largest audience possible. Conservatives thrive on talk radio because people identify with what they have to say, keep tuning in, and generate advertising sales. Liberals fail because people don't
identify with their message. You should realize that based on the fact that NPR and PBS are having a hard time making ends meet while conservative commericial radio and TV programming thrive. Liberals need the fairness doctrine to be reinstated in order to compete because based on merit and appeal, they don't have a chance.

And, perhaps you missed this article in the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday and all over the Internet (not, of course on state-run media) http://tinyurl.com/mo5z77 showing that conservatives actually outnumber liberals in all 50 states. So, the fact that conservatives are showing up in protest to the most liberal agenda this country has ever seen should come as no surprise.

Kimberly
Saginaw
sande2 Says:       On August 22, 2009 at 12:22 AM
"Reactionary Plolitical Hack", "fruitcake", "ideological bully" "lunatic fringe" and "right wing reactionaries"?
My goodness, a lot of name calling! Last time I checked, I was just a mom (with three bachelors degrees), a wife and nurse who loves my children.

When I saw TARP go through, I thought "What?? We are in debt!" I then started to question why the border hasn't been secured,(for after all, didn't we have the funds allocated for it?) and started to be more aware of what was going on in government. I am almost sorry I did. Over the years, our Constitution has been dismantled, discarded and government has grown, along with our debt.

Then there was hope . . . maybe this next guy will cut out all the pork like he promised . . . "What?? They didn't even READ the bill? More pork?" Stimulus. For who? Okay, that's just one. Give them a chance.

Then Cap and Trade. I find news stories conflicted, the sources are really biased! I do my own reading of the bills. I don't like what I see. I don't want this government monopoly, I smell fish. I call my reps for the first time in my life.

Fast forward. I have been to protests. (I haven't seen any violence). I have called, emailed and sent letters to my so-called representatives. I don't care what party they are from. They are not listening to me, or a lot of us "fruitcakes" - is that the term you used? I am getting frustrated. I feel I have no choice, no voice in the matters at hand. I have handed my children all this debt, and it is growing exponentially. I adopted from overseas, and to my naivete, I thought I would be giving them a better chance at life here. "Sorry" doesn't cut it.

So, you think I have no consideration for the less fortunate, no thoughtfulness, no reason. Rather audacious statement. I don't like to play games either. And the "Fairness" Doctrine?? If someone doesn't like a radio or T.V. station, turn the channel. I disagree with your position, I think you do propose censorship.

There are other options to solving these issues, there are other bills that are not being looked at. Why? (Look at HR 3400, for example). What is being proposed with ALL of these things, is bigger government, and government control. I feel that unless I speak up, and "make a fool of (myself)", that I will regret it forever. I will be heard. If someone doesn't listen, I will just get louder. Not in a literal sense, of course (I know you think I am a fringe political groupie), but I will double my efforts. In the mean time, my floors don't get swept as much, my bed goes unmade. But I have been neglectful in my duty as a U.S. Citizen.

James Madison stated "I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpations . . .. This danger ought to be wisely guarded against." (Elliot, Debates in the State Conventions, 3:87.)

Oh, one more thing; You called your "friend", "intellectually unsophisticated"? Nice.


Regards, S. Johnson
Agree? or Disagree?


Dave Rogers

Dave Rogers is a former editorial writer for the Bay City Times and a widely read,
respected journalist/writer in and around Bay City.
(Contact Dave Via Email at carraroe@aol.com)

More from Dave Rogers

Send This Story to a Friend!       Letter to the editor       Link to this Story
Printer-Friendly Story View


--- Advertisments ---
     


0200 Nd: 03-24-2024 d 4 cpr 0






12/31/2020 P3v3-0200-Ad.cfm

SPONSORED LINKS



12/31/2020 drop ads P3v3-0200-Ad.cfm


Designed at OJ Advertising, Inc. (V3) (v3) Software by Mid-Michigan Computer Consultants
Bay City, Michigan USA
All Photographs and Content Copyright © 1998 - 2024 by OJA/MMCC. They may be used by permission only.
P3V3-0200 (1) 0   ID:Default   UserID:Default   Type:reader   R:x   PubID:mbC   NewspaperID:noPaperID
  pid:1560   pd:11-18-2012   nd:2024-03-24   ax:2024-03-28   Site:5   ArticleID:4112   MaxA: 999999   MaxAA: 999999
claudebot