Bay City, Michigan 48706
Front Page 03/28/2024 09:22 About us
www.mybaycity.com November 11, 2013
(Prior Story)   Columns ArTicle 8594   (Next Story)

HEALTH DEBATE 1952: Truman vs. Ike Proves Little Change in Philosophies

November 11, 2013       Leave a Comment
By: Dave Rogers

Printer Friendly Story View

Everybody knows progressives have for decades tried to get universal health care.

But the 1952 arguments by Harry S. Truman and Dwight D. Eisenhower echo strangely as though they just occurred.

"Truman Urges Health Guards: Favors Medicine at Price People Can Pay," reads the headline in The Bay City Times of 16 September 1952.

As the 1952 Presidential campaign pitting Republican Ike vs. Democrat Truman, the debate turned to . . . what else, health care.

Eisenhower had stated his stand against any "federally-operated compulsory health insurance program." Ike remarked that the country's health problems could be handled by "voluntary means" and "locally indigent medical care."

The GOP candidate asserted such a federal health program as advocated by Truman would result in "regimented, assembly-line treatment" with "less and poorer medical care for more."

Calling Ike's stand on health care "horse and buggy" ideas, then President Truman barked: "That's like saying we don't need any form of social security except the county poor house."

The newspaper article from United Press (long defunct wire service) stated: "Truman avoided mentioning any form of national health insurance such as he has advocated but defended his position that the government should help people meet medical expenses."

Without assigning blame for high health care costs, Truman commented that "these costs have to be met somehow if we want to reap the blessing of medical research in the relief of human suffering."

The Democratic candidate noted the government was bound by the constitution to promote the general welfare of its citizens.

Calling the Republicans "pullbacks," Truman said "they just don't want to move ahead at all, no matter how it's done. They just want to stand still, with things as they are, or even move backward."

He denied that it is "socialism" for the government to "help make it possible for every American to protect his health."

Do these arguments sound familiar even though they were forwarded some 61 years ago?

Of course, Ike and Richard Nixon won that election over Adlai Stevenson and John Sparkman, Truman having declined to seek renomination; but the debate over health care was destined to continue until the present day, even with overwhelming need, an adopted bill and a Supreme Court decision in favor. Sadly, it is not settled yet, and millions of Americans still fall in the category Truman described as "human suffering."

###

Printer Friendly Story View
Prior Article

February 10, 2020
by: Rachel Reh
Family Winter Fun Fest is BACC Hot Spot for 2/10/2020
Next Article

February 2, 2020
by: Kathy Rupert-Mathews
MOVIE REVIEW: "Just Mercy" ... You Will Shed Tears, or at Least You Should
Agree? or Disagree?


Dave Rogers

Dave Rogers is a former editorial writer for the Bay City Times and a widely read,
respected journalist/writer in and around Bay City.
(Contact Dave Via Email at carraroe@aol.com)

More from Dave Rogers

Send This Story to a Friend!       Letter to the editor       Link to this Story
Printer-Friendly Story View


--- Advertisments ---
     


0200 Nd: 03-24-2024 d 4 cpr 0






12/31/2020 P3v3-0200-Ad.cfm

SPONSORED LINKS



12/31/2020 drop ads P3v3-0200-Ad.cfm


Designed at OJ Advertising, Inc. (V3) (v3) Software by Mid-Michigan Computer Consultants
Bay City, Michigan USA
All Photographs and Content Copyright © 1998 - 2024 by OJA/MMCC. They may be used by permission only.
P3V3-0200 (1) 0   ID:Default   UserID:Default   Type:reader   R:x   PubID:mbC   NewspaperID:noPaperID
  pid:1560   pd:11-18-2012   nd:2024-03-24   ax:2024-03-28   Site:5   ArticleID:8594   MaxA: 999999   MaxAA: 999999
claudebot